The 2016 EU-wide stress test aims to provide to supervisors, banks and other market agents a common analytical framework to consistently compare and assess the resilience of large EU banks and the EU banking system to adverse economic shocks.
In particular, this exercise is designed to guide the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) that will be carried out by the competent authorities (CAs) in 2016. The disclosure of granular information at an individual level enables the adoption of an adequate market discipline and allows competent authorities to apply a common framework within their assessments.
This document prepared by the R&D area of Management Solutions analyses the main 2016 stress test results focusing on the aggregated results across the EU, as well as on the results of those countries with the highest concentration of asset’s volumes within the banking system.
The phase-in CET 1 ratio fell from 13.2% in 2015 to 9.4% in the adverse scenario in 2018, due to a capital reduction of €269 bn as well as an increase by 10% of RWA (the credit risk RWA are the ones with the highest impact). Moreover, the level of provisions within the EU increases by 191% between 2015 and 2018 (adverse scenario); meanwhile, the coverage ratio decreased between 2015 and 2018 within the two scenarios considered. Finally, the net benefits are affected significantly due to the credit risk losses of the adverse scenario, which are caused by counterparties in Italy, UK, Spain and France.
Scope of application
51 EU banks have participated in 2016, covering approximately 70% of the EU banking system’s assets, in terms of consolidated assets.
Download the technical note by clicking here.
Latest technical notes released:
|Non-performing loans (NPLs) framework|
|Final Guidelines on ICAAP and ILAAP information collected for SREP purposes / Supervisory expectations and Draft Guides to the ICAAP and ILAAP|
|Overview of the impacts and potential lines of action after the Basel III reform|
|Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms|
|Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures|
© GMS Management Solutions, S.L., 2018. All rights reserved. The information contained on this publication is of a general nature and does not constitute a professional opinion or an advisory service. The data used in this publication come from public sources. GMS Management Solutions, SL assumes no liability for the veracity or accuracy of such data.